Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04546
Original file (BC 2013 04546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04546

	 		COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was awarded 
the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His record should reflect his expert M-16 qualification.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member of the Air Force who served 
from 24 February 1966 through 21 February 1970. 

Upon review of his records, AFPC/DPSID verified the applicant’s 
entitlement to the Air Force Commendation Medal.  His record 
will be updated accordingly upon final Board action. 

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  After a review of the applicant’s 
official military record, the applicant’s entitlement to the 
SAEMR could not be verified.

The SAEMR is awarded to all United States Air Force Service 
members who, after 1 January 1963, qualify as “expert” in small-
arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun.  
Qualification as “expert” in both weapons after 22 June 1972 
shall be denoted by a bronze star worn on the service ribbon.

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 7 March 2014, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has received no 
response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the available evidence of record and the applicant's 
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the AFPC/DPSID 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support his 
request.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find relief beyond what has been administratively corrected 
is not warranted. 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-04546 in Executive Session on 22 May 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-04546 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Sep 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 2 Jan 14.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Mar 14.



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04499

    Original file (BC 2013 04499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the SAEMR. Upon final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02342

    Original file (BC 2013 02342.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 September 2013, AFPC/DPAPP reviewed the applicant’s records and verified his boots on the ground Foreign Service time at Aviano Air Base, Italy from 11 July 1979 through 29 March 1982, the amount of Foreign Service time already listed on his DD Form 214. The SAEMR is awarded to all United States Air Force Service members who, after 1 January 1963, qualify as “expert” in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. There is insufficient documentation to support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03134

    Original file (BC 2012 03134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID states the SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00081

    Original file (BC-2013-00081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 21 March 1960, the applicant was issued an Air Form 741, Small Arms Qualification Record, which indicates he qualified as a “sharpshooter,” but did not qualify as a “marksman” or an “expert”. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03252

    Original file (BC-2012-03252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. It is awarded to all United States Air Force service members who after 1 January 1963, qualified as “expert” in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. DPSID indicates that after a thorough review of the applicant’s military service record, they were unable to locate official documentation verifying he qualified as “expert” with either the handgun or the M-16 rifle.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03433

    Original file (BC-2012-03433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID states that the SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 24 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01785

    Original file (BC 2014 01785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01785 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR, w 1BSS). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no official documentation in the applicant's personnel records verifying he qualified as expert with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00226

    Original file (BC 2013 00226.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00226 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. After considering the applicant’s statement, his commander recommended the applicant for discharge. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00783

    Original file (BC 2014 00783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00783 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and Bronze Service Star (BSS) device on his Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). The applicant’s DD Form 214, reflect the award of the following Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01647

    Original file (BC 2014 01647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Good Conduct Medal is awarded to enlisted members who have honorably completed three continuous years of active military service subsequent to 26 August 1940, and who are recommended by their commanding officers for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity. The applicant’s dates of service are after the awarding dates for award of the Good Conduct Medal. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or...